|
5-23-06
STUDY SHOWS POTENTIAL ECONOMIC PAYOFFS TIED TO HEALTHY EATING
AMES, Iowa – Answering the question, "Does five-a-day pay?" could mean a lot more
to Iowans than eating five servings of fruit and vegetables every day. It could
mean an additional $302 million in sales and more than 4,000 jobs added to the
Iowa economy if just 25 percent of the extra fruit and vegetables are Iowa
grown.
A new report from the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture considers the
economic impact if Iowans followed a diet of five servings of selected
Iowa-grown fruit and vegetables each day for three months of the year. The
report considered additional production of apples, carrots, spinach, squash and
tomatoes, half marketed directly by Iowa producers and half sold through
existing retail stores.
"This is an important question to consider because it ties healthy eating to the
additional economic development that could occur if Iowa farmers provided some
of the food for this change in diet," said Rich Pirog, who leads the Center's
Marketing and Food Systems Initiative.
"Eating five servings of fruit and vegetables is recommended because of the
potential health benefits, but if more of that produce is grown in Iowa, the
state would reap considerable economic benefits, too," Pirog added.
Pirog said the report addresses four different scenarios, each hypothesizing an
increase in the production of fruit and vegetables in Iowa. The "five-a-day"
scenario would increase Iowa consumption of five produce items (apples, carrots,
spinach, squash and tomatoes) to a total of five daily half-cup servings, with
100 percent of the crops coming from Iowa farms for three months of the year. He said the
items were selected because they can be grown easily in all Iowa counties and
potentially could be supplied for three months of the year. They also were
chosen for their higher nutrient density relative to other choices.
The economic impact analysis was prepared by Dave Swenson, an associate
scientist in the Iowa State University Department of Economics, and reviewed by
Pirog and Angie Tagtow, registered dietitian for the Iowa Department of Public
Health. The analysis was based on several assumptions:
-
Increased production of fruits and vegetables would reduce
corn and soybean production in Iowa. In the "five-a-day" scenario, 31,800 acres
of crop land would be required to produce 382 million pounds of produce with
expected farm-level receipts estimated at $101.2 million.
-
Prices reflect sales of conventional rather than organic
produce. Swenson estimated that the retail value of the "five-a-day" scenario
would be $429.7 million.
-
Half of the new fruit and vegetables would be sold directly
by producers and half would be available in existing retail stores. The
analysis offsets the reduced retail store sales of produce in the grocery
sector due to increased direct market sales by farmers.
-
All produce is sold fresh for in-state
consumption.
-
The model also takes into account the rise in inputs needed to
produce these crops, such as additional machinery and seed.
According to the report, the "five-a-day" scenario would sustain (either directly
or indirectly) $331.2 million in total economic output, $123.3 million in total
labor income, and 4,484 total jobs in Iowa. Compared with existing production, its
net impact would be $302.4 million in total new industrial output, $112.6
million in labor income, and 4,094 jobs.
The impact is high because a “five-a-day” scenario would mean that many Iowans
would eat more fruit and vegetables than they do now. According to the Iowa
Department of Public Health, only 19.5 percent of Iowans eat five or more
servings of fruits and vegetables every day. The impact also is high because
much of the produce eaten in Iowa comes from outside the state. Based on current
estimates, only 25 to 50 percent of the apples, 12 percent of the squash, 10 percent
of the tomatoes, 5 percent of the carrots and 1 percent of the spinach
consumed on a fresh weight basis in Iowa is grown within the state.
Swenson said the model is based on a common economic concept of import
substitution.
"By substituting in-state production for out-of-state purchases, money that
otherwise would have left the state remains in the state," he said. "Keeping
money in the state is desirable because money that leaves the state rarely
returns. Money that remains in the state has a multiplier effect on the whole
economy."
Swenson and Pirog said the scenarios generated in the report are hypothetical,
and would require huge shifts in the infrastructure of Iowa’s fruit and
vegetable industry, as well as gains in the Iowa market share taken from states
such as California.
Pirog added: “Even though the scenarios are hypothetical, it is important to
consider options that could be a win-win for Iowa’s farmers, the state's economy, and
our overall health.”
The report, "The Economic Impacts of Increased Fruit and Vegetable Production
and Consumption in Iowa: Phase II," is available on the Leopold Center web site
at: www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/files/health_0606.pdf.
For more information,
contact:
|