University of Northern Iowa biology
professor Laura Jackson presented a provocative lecture at
Iowa State University in October about environmental
problems related to the current corn-soybean production
system. She discussed how degradation of natural resources
has caused a loss of biological diversity and listed
obstacles to changing the system.
 |
|
|
Jackson’s presentation was
this year’s edition of the annual Shivvers Lecture,
which explores ways that agriculture can sustain natural
resources and small farms. Presented in memory of John
Shivvers who farmed near Knoxville, the series is hosted
by the Leopold Center.
Jackson teaches courses in ecology, conservation biology
and restoration of agricultural landscapes and since
2003 has represented UNI on the Leopold Center Advisory
Board. In 2002, she co-edited a book of essays, The
Farm as Natural Habitat: Reconnecting Food Systems to
Ecosystems, with her mother, Dana L. Jackson, senior
program associate for the Land Stewardship Project in
Minnesota.
Here are excerpts from the presentation.
About the Iowa landscape
When I moved from Kansas to Iowa in 1993, it was
truly shocking to see an ecological sacrifice zone with
virtually no native plant or animal species for miles
and miles and miles. I am always astounded that I can
get on Highway 20 in Cedar Falls and drive west for six
hours and not see – with the exception of riparian zones
along the rivers – a single patch of native vegetation.
In most areas of the upper Midwest, land in agricultural
production is barren for nine months of the year.
Because of our corn/soybean rotation, we’re looking at a
system only collecting solar energy about three months
of the year…We’re just using a tiny fraction of the
energy that comes into our state… and we should be using
more of it.
It hasn’t always been like this. Between 1860, when we
first started plowing down the prairies, until about
1960, we maintained a roughly equal proportion of row
crops and sod crops – hay or pasture in rotation with
crops, or small grains like oats, barley, wheat and rye
that were in the rotation because they were necessary.
Loss of biodiversity
We’re seeing a number of losses of species diversity.
Notable are the loss of large vertebrates, such as
pallid sturgeon and the interior least tern, associated
with the Missouri River where they are being affected by
hydroelectric dams used for flood control and for
channelization.
Grassland nesting songbirds such as the bobolink and
western meadowlark … migrate from Argentina and Central
America every year and attempt to nest in the former
prairies. At one time they could nest in farmers’
hayfields, but today there are so few of those left that
their numbers are declining.
Ecosystem restoration
We need to restore the tallgrass prairie ecosystem.
That doesn’t mean restoring prairie plants but the
ecosystem services that prairies provided. We need to
reduce soil disturbance and tillage … No-till has been a
benefit, but no-till still has bare dirt and no deep
perennial roots for most of the year.
There has been progress in Iowa in developing more
perennial systems and options for people. The Leopold
Center’s grasslands program works with all kinds of
approaches and producers who may want to convert a small
part of their operation to rotational grazing or some
other use of the land.
Obstacles to change
In order for my ecological dreams to work, farm
policy needs to change. There’s no way it will fix
itself.
We need to balance the interest of taxpayers, eaters and
farmers, and I believe those taxpayers and eaters and
farmers all are wishing for a healthy environment in
which to raise their children.
We need to reward clean water, carbon sequestration,
biodiversity. These are the multiple benefits that
agriculture can provide our society. We also need to
make conservation policy performance-based instead of
practice-based.
Lessons from Easter Island
Jared Diamond’s new book, Collapse: How Societies
Choose to Fail or Succeed, is pertinent to the
questions that we’re facing in the Midwest … [He writes
that the] history of ecological failure is that an
inordinate amount of energy and precious human and
natural resources get poured into precisely the wrong
thing. The Easter Islanders found a forest of giant
palms seven feet across, 60 feet high. By the time they
were done, they were cannibals, living in chaos and
want.
They were convinced that it was very important to build
magnificent statues on massive stone platforms without
benefit of cranes or fossil fuel. Their island had the
perfect soft stone to do it.
Over time, as various clans competed for dominance on
this tiny island, the statues grew in size and people
became more adept at moving these 60-foot tall statues
nine kilometers across the island on wooden rails. As
living conditions were deteriorating and their forests
were disappearing, they decided that what they really
needed to do was to add red hats – 12,000-pound red
stones on top of the statues.
How do we recognize these red hats? How do we recognize
the things that we are ceaselessly investing in that are
not doing a good job? May I suggest bushels per acre?
It’s going to be hard to give up on this demanding god
that we have pleased so well for so many years.
We need to remember that it is the land and the health
of the land that is our true family, our true source of
wealth and strength and long-lasting security and
support. Aldo Leopold encouraged respect for this web of
life, a healthy respect because it’s related to our
existence.