 |
|
|
Iowa farmers are caught in a bind: current federal farm
subsidy pro grams reward intensive corn-soybean cropping
systems, which farmers know are unhealthy for the soil
and the environment. Yet conservation programs included
in the 2002 Farm Bill are oversubscribed, underfunded
and difficult to access, farmers say.
About 50 producers attended six listening sessions
focused on the upcoming Farm Bill and held in various
locations around Iowa during February. Funded by a 2006
grant from the Leopold Center’s Policy Initiative, the
sessions were conducted by the Iowa Farmers Union (IFU)
Education Foundation.
Common themes emerged at each session. Almost all
farmers want to be good stewards of the land, but in
order to make a living, they are forced to use loan
deficiency payments and commodity subsidies that are
tied to a very few crops: in Iowa, corn and soybeans.
This mono-cropping depletes the soil, requiring the use
of more and more chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
Farmers also were concerned about low commodity prices,
which have forced them to sell grain below the cost of
production and rely on federal support to continue
farming.
“I was never in the [subsidy] program until 2002,” said
Wayne Demmer, a farmer from Dyersville. “The government
should assist farmers when they need it. The concept was
a safety net to maintain prices.”
Most farmers mentioned that the bulk of the subsidy
payments go to a small percentage of producers, often
large operators who know how to “farm the system.”
Other participants said they worried that their sons or
daughters who want to farm will not be able to make a
living.
Land prices and cash rent rates are too high, which some
farmers feel is worsened by the 1031 land exchange, a
tax shelter for those who sell property and purchase
“like” property within a limited time. Many urban
property owners are selling buildings and purchasing
Iowa farmland at inflated prices through the 1031
exchange.
Participants also discussed the need to connect young or
beginning farmers to those who are getting ready to
retire. One suggestion was a federal income tax credit
for producers who transition land to a new farmer.
“One farm can’t support two families,” another farmer
said. “We need to work on alternative, value-added
production being accessible to beginning farmers. You
won’t get small farmers back on the land in commodity
production.”
Most of the producers favored farmer-owned alternative
energy production, such as ethanol, bio-diesel and
biomass crops. Some stressed that farmer ownership is
crucial. “I don’t want us to become an energy colony for
eastern investors,” one producer commented.
Other concerns included trade, organic issues, water and
air quality, and concentration in the livestock
industry. Comments from the sessions will be included in
a report that will be shared with various groups and
policy makers. For information, contact the Iowa Farmers
Union at (800) 775-5227.