Comparison of Three Crop
Rotations [chart with economic data]
As energy prices go up, the Leopold Center continues to
monitor the bottom line as it relates to alternative
cropping systems that would require more management but
fewer purchased inputs. And the bottom line is looking
good for four-year systems.
Since 2002, Iowa State University agronomist Matt
Liebman has been conducting a crop rotation experiment
at the Marsden Farm near Ames in Boone County. He is
investigating the effects of different crop management
systems on weeds, but also collects yield data that can
be used to determine the economic performance of
different systems over the past three cropping seasons.
The study includes three rotations:
-
a conventional two-year system (corn-soybean),
-
a three-year system suitable for producers with a need
or market for small grains (corn-soybean-triticale
underseeded with red clover), and
-
a four-year system suitable for producers with
livestock on forage (corn-soybean-triticale underseeded
with alfalfa for hay).
Averaged over the three-year period of 2003-2005,
Liebman reduced nitrogen fertilizer use by 50 and 73
percent in the three- and four-year rotations, and
reduced herbicide use by 71 and 78 percent, while
averaging yields slightly higher than the two-year
rotation.
"Despite those reductions in fertilizers and herbicides,
we were able to maintain fertility levels and achieve
excellent weed control," Liebman said.
The three- and four-year rotations rely on rotary
hoeing, banded herbicide and interrow cultivation for
weed control during the corn-soybean portion of the
rotation; the two-year rotation uses broadcast pre- and
post-emergent applications. The longer rotations exploit
nitrogen fixation by alfalfa and clover, and receive
cattle manure (seven tons per acre) prior to corn.
Despite differences in fertilizer and herbicide inputs,
corn and soybean yields have averaged slightly higher
than the two-year rotation. Triticale yields in the
three-year rotation (with a red clover companion crop)
and the four-year rotation (with an alfalfa companion
crop) have been similar.
Returns to land and management were greatest in the
four-year system ($176 per acre), least in the
three-year system ($144 per acre) with the two-year
system falling in between ($158 per acre).
Labor requirements were 58 percent and 81 percent higher
in the three-year and four-year rotations, respectively,
compared with the two-year system. Compared with the
two-year rotation, production costs in the three-year
and four-year rotations were 23 percent and 28 percent
lower.
A chart with an economic
comparison of the three crop rotation systems was prepared by ISU Extension farm
management field specialist Craig Chase. Fieldwork hours
and cost of production are estimated using annual
figures published by ISU Extension. Corn and soybean
prices were 10-year NASS averages, triticale price was
set the same as the corn price, and alfalfa and straw
prices were those commonly found in Iowa over the past
few years.
The research, which is continuing in 2006, is funded by
a multi-year grant from the Leopold Center Ecology
Initiative, the ISU Agronomy Department Endowment, and
the USDA National Research Initiative.